This very well could be the most overused phrase in sports.
It's also the #1 goal of every NFL player when he steps onto the football field. When they slip on their pads, uniform, and helmet in the locker room, they know nothing else. This mantra is what propels these athletes to relinquish all accessible firepower while down in the trenches and out in the open field of each gridiron battle.
All coaches will tell you that this is the bedrock where their coaching philosophies are built. Every strategy and nugget of information that is taught to the players is for the sole purpose of winning every game that they play.
But, in recent history, it has become customary by many coaches to scale back and take a different approach to the last one or two games of the season when their team has clinched the playoffs and cannot alter its current position in the upcoming post-season. That strategy involves resting starters for all or a certain percentage of the game.
While I understand the common-sense approach that produced this decision, I simply don't agree.
Yes, I get it --- There's nothing else to play for so why start your star players and run the risk of them getting hurt and being out for the playoffs? Here's a thought. Don't they run the risk of getting hurt every time they step on the field? What's worse: Tony Romo getting hurt in Week 10 and, as a result, Dallas missing the playoffs or Romo getting hurt this week in Washington and having a Super Bowl-winning QB in Brad Johnson taking over? Give me the former.
The Cowboys are pretty deep all around the board so an injury to a player who has started all or most of the season is going to be treated like any other injury. You simply bring in the back-up and trust that he's ready to perform to the max as he would in any game of the season.
If someone is nursing an injury like T.O., Terence Newman, etc. then I can understand developing a game plan without them, but if I was Wade Phillips, I would start Romo, Barber, Witten, etc. and give it 120%!
Why wouldn't you want to end the season on a high note with a ton of momentum knowing that you have the next two weeks off to rest from all the aching muscles or minor injuries?
Personally, I'm more concerned if Romo doesn't play this Sunday. That would mean that he would not play for three weeks and then you have to look at the issue of him not being rusty. I simply see this game vs. the Skins as a tune-up for the playoffs; an opportunity to hone your game and work on some things that you may think is a detriment right now. And, who better to be out there than the same personnel that is going to be used in the playoffs? The last time I checked, if you lose one game in the playoffs, then you get to stay home for 7 months.
I don't think it's old-school thinking when you play all of your starters for every regular season game regardless of what your goals are for that game. It's called respecting the integrity of the game by giving it your all for 16 games.
As a head coach, when you start looking at whether to start your regulars, how long they should play, etc., then you are communicating the notion that if the team loses, it doesn't matter. You've met all your goals for the regular season so let's "baby it" the last game and be very conservative.
If you do that, then you aren't taking what's worked for you before and simply not playing to win.